Coincidence in the Age of Infotainment…
I’ve finally finished this post which has collected dust for months. And yes, I’m rumbling. But today, nothing’s going to stop me :-)
Coincidence in the Age of Infotainment…
There’s nothing spectacular about the report on national security, published by the Swiss Federal Department of Justice and Police, and released May 30th, 2006. While the headline on the press release sounds a bit alarming, the rest of the text is not.
The media, however, looks at the report from a different angle: risk of terrorism rising in Switzerland (Terrorgefahr in der Schweiz steigt; source: NZZ). Given that the article by the NZZ was published on the very same day the report was published, one has to wonder if anyone actually read through the full version, which has 95 pages and is available as PDF.
I highly doubt it; instead, the media (NZZ is just one example) was probably happy enough to have a new and sexy headline. Or did the media get its claims from other sources?
Just two days later, on June 1st, 2006, the Swiss Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sports released their Rüstungsprogramm 2006, requesting more fundings in order to fulfil its military and protectional duties. One of the reasons citied (and exaggeratedly reported on) was the rising danger of terrorism. Of course, when the media calls, the political parties answer. The CVP, for example, supports the request. According to the CVP, the Swiss military has to be ready in cases of terror alerts, and must be able to protect valuable resources, buildings and other possible targets.
And I wonder if this is all is just coincidence? In any way, the Swiss military, in its current shape and organisation, is not the right answer to terrorism. Should it chase terrorist with their tanks? No, thanks. The fight against terrorism, especially in Switzerland, should focus on more realistic scenarios. Switzerland could and should play an important role in diplomacy. Switzerland could and should take a leading role in its treatment and integration of foreigners in Switzerland. Switzerland could and should be prepared for emergencies, but by way of information gathering, prevention and organising, and not by map exercises (like some US agencies do). And finally, Switzerland should not, and should not be allowed to, disregard, limit or control the civil rights of its citizens.
…the Culture of Fear…
While I don’t think that we in Switzerland live in a culture of fear, I often wonder about the general feeling of fear and uncertainty. Take this survey by ACNielsen as an example. Of the 40 countries covered, the sampled Swiss citizens were among the ones most worried about terrorism. Percent wise, Swiss citizens were more worried than people living in the United States or England. And while the difference to these two countries probably is within the margin of error, I’m still very surprised.
However, I’m a bit sceptical about the above survey. Unfortunately, it doesn’t offer any information on its methods, or raw data. If you take a look at the annual ‘Worry Barometer‘ by Credit Suisse, other concerns top terrorism by a wide and supporting margin (see Slide 3).
Maybe Swiss people are just easily scared? This could at least explain why Switzerland is one of the best insured countries of the world? Well, my dear, fellow Swiss citizens: Thanks for your worries. But please don’t forget that we have the privilege to live in a wonderful and peaceful country. And while we certainly must try our best to keep and improve upon that status, we also should not forget all the people living a less prosperous life. By virtue of great privilege comes great responsibility.
…and other Rumblings
Back to the media scene. While there are some excellent sources (the beloved author of this blog is a passionate reader of Die Zeit, Foreign Affairs and Das Magazin, for example), many are not.
Take the national TV station SF as an example. It clearly has the mandate to inform the people. Yet its two most prominent news progamms are almost worthless. ‘10 vor 10′, the flagship which is supposed to deliver background information, tampers in infotainment waters. The ‘Tagesschau’, the daily news show, is happy with presenting its viewers with MTV-esque clip sequences. In addition, they also have an unbelievable talent for asking obvious questions. In an interview about Iran’s nuclear programm their questions were boring. What’s worse, they didn’t even take into account the answers of their interview partner (Ulrich Tilgner), but stuck to their pre-made questions.
That this can be done better is proven on a daily basis by some fine shows on stations such as ARTE, ZDF and 3sat. Even SF actually has some good programms, but fails to promote and expand them. Do they lack faith in the intelligence of their viewers?
Unfortunately, the print media isn’t always better. The very popular newslet ‘20min’ reprints press releases and adds some articles on nightlife and celebrities to the juice. The few articles they write by themselves are incoherent at best. For example, their headline talks about ‘rund 50′ (about 50 people). In the following text, they mention ‘etwa drei Dutzend Personen’ (circa three dozen persons). By all accounts, that are 36 people. Or are it ‘gegen 40 personen’ (up to 40 persons), as the article later claims?



